International Zinc Association
|| > Advanced search > Your last search

ZINC DIECASTING ALLOYS

Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of zinc alloy diecastings depend not only on alloy composition but also on casting conditions  that affect the cooling rate. Conditions that promote rapid cooling in the die give the highest strength and hardness. Hence thin wall sections are proportionally stronger than thick. The tensile properties in the table of “Nominal Properties” below represent typical values for a sound casting around 2mm thick. Properties at different thicknesses can be judged from subsequent tables. The nominal properties are “original” values measured about five to eight weeks after casting. Properties change over time; very slowly at ambient temperatures, or more quickly at elevated temperatures. For alloys ZP3, ZP5 and ZP8 tensile strength and hardness decline while elongation increases. The elongation figure for ZP2 tends to fall over the first few weeks or months of room temperature ageing, after which it begins to increase slowly.

The relative performance of zinc alloys and other common materials are shown in the “Comparison with Alternative Materials” section.   

The properties in the various tables below were obtained from a variety of different studies using test specimens of differing designs made under differing conditions. Caution should be taken when comparing the results from different sets of results unless the test specimens and test conditions are identical. Nevertheless despite the potentially wide differences in the casting conditions used for the various specimens tested, the as cast tensile strengths are surprisingly consistent for specimens of similar thickness. It should be born in mind however that the various investigators would have made sure that the test specimens were “sound”. Practically all zinc alloy diecastings contain some porosity, and “sound” is therefore not an absolute term. In zinc pressure die-casting, the porosity originates from two sources. Firstly, from trapped air that is unable to escape from the runner system plus mould which are themselves sealed and filled by molten metal in milliseconds. Secondly, shrinkage porosity is naturally formed as the hot liquid metal turns to its cooled solid state. Provided the porosity level is between, say, 1% and 5% and the individual pores are very small it is not significantly weakening. The actual distribution of porosity is at least as important as the nominal percentage porosity. As a result designers and diecasters should attempt to ensure soundness in strength critical areas of castings, porosity elsewhere is not so important, at least not from a structural integrity point of view.

With the increasing use of computer-aided engineering has come a demand for closer specification of materials properties. In the past simple statements of strength values were considered adequate without statement of the specimen dimensions and the test conditions. As a result of this change in demand the properties of zinc diecasting alloys and many other materials are currently undergoing re-evaluation. In the tables below those property values that are related to a fully specified test are shown in bold font. 

Because zinc is a low melting point material, zinc alloy castings are liable to creep. (Creep is defined as the time-dependent strain that takes place under constant load.) Where zinc alloy diecastings are to be employed in situations where they experience long term loading, especially at elevated temperatures, the effects of creep may need to be taken into account. The creep resistance of alloys ZP8 and ZP2 are superior to that of ZP5, which in turn is superior to ZP3. Information that will allow estimation of the amount of creep deformation that will occur to a proposed casting design, under a given set of load, temperature and design life parameters is included in the Creep Properties section.

Reference 2

Nominal Mechanical Property Values

As Pressure Diecast, Tested at 20o Celsius.
Property values that are related to a fully specified test are shown in bold.

Alloy



other names
ZP3

Alloy 3, Zamak3, ZP0400, ZnAL4
ZP5

Alloy 5, Zamak5, ZP0410, ZnAl4Cu1
ZP2

Alloy 2, Zamak2, ZP0430, ZnAl4Cu3
ZP8

ZA8, ZP0810, ZnAl8Cu1
GDSL

ZP0730, ZnAl7Cu3
Acuzinc5

ZP0350, ZnAl3Cu5
EZAC HF alloy
Mechanical Properties
   Ultimate Tensile Strength: (MPa) (1) (6) 315 331 397 386,8 387 407,79 414 276
   Yield Strength - 0.2% Offset: (MPa) (1) (6) 276 295 360 318,6 315 337,84 393 234
   Elongation: % in 70mm (1) (2) (6)
      ε at UTS 2,37 3,09 2,21 2,53 1,4
      ε at rupture 7,73 3,43 5,99 3,41 1,5 6 1 5,3
   Modulus of Elasticity (Young): (GPa) (1)(4)(6) 84,3 84,5 84,4 82,7 84 85 84,3
   Shear Strength: (MPa) (7) 214 262 317 275 245 280
   Poison coefficient (8) 0,27 0,27 0,27 0,29
   Hardness: Brinell (1) (6) 97 114 130 95-110 119 115 140 93
   Impact strength
      Charpy Unnotched 20°C: J/cm2 (6) 116 131 96 162,5 95
      Charpy Notched 20°C: J/cm2 (6) 4 5 9
   Fatigue Strength Rotary Bend (MPa) (3) (7)
      5x108 cycles 48 57 59 103
      1x107 cycles 81 86 104 63 139
   Compressive Yield Strength: MPa (5)
      0.2% Offset: MPa 274 199 257 233

Notes:
(1) Flat test specimen, thickness 1,5mm; Property measured 8 weeks after casting. Test speed 10mm/minute.
(2) Strain measured with extensometer. L0 =70 for alloy 2, 3, 5, ZA8 and GDSL. L0=50mm for other alloys.
(3) Fatigue test sample diameter = 5,55mm. Fatigue limit determined with staircase method
(4) Young modulus of elasticity calculated from stress strain graph.
(5) The test specimen is a cylinder of 0.24” diameter and 0.48” height. The cylinders were machined from diecast impact test samples. Test speed: 1,1 MPa/sec. Strain is based on crosshead displacement.
(6) Umicore R&D (ref.5)
(7) ILZRO (ref.3)
(8) Umicore R&D/Brescia Univ. (ref. 6)

Stress vs Strain Curves

ima01
Reference 5

Mechanical Properties vs Test Temperature

Tensile Properties vs Test Temperature

sample geometry Lo 70mm
width 19,6mm
thickness 1.5 mm
sample type diecast, air cooled
8 weeks aged at room temperature
test set-up 10 test samples per condition
equipment Zwick/Roell Z050
test speed 10mm/minute
test temperature ambient temperature (20°C)

ZP3, ZP0400, ZnAl4, alloy 3, Zamak 3
Temperature

°C
Yield strength
σ0,2
Ultimate strength
σmax
Young's modulus
E
strain at rupture
εrupture
uniform strain
ε at σmax
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
GPa
stdev
GPa
average
%
stdev
%
average
%
stdev
%
-40 303 9 360 11 82 10 2 1 2 1
-20 297 7 345 12 77 10 2 1 2 1
0 289 3 340 4 85 5 2 1 2 0
23 276 9 315 3 84 13 8 2 2 0
40 241 3 293 3 78 5 14 1 3 0
60 213 3 260 2 73 4 23 3 3 0
80 180 2 218 3 58 5 47 7 2 0
135 72 4 81 6 51 4

ZP5, ZP0410, ZnAl4Cu1, alloy 5, Zamak 5
Temperature

°C
Yield strength
σ0,2
Ultimate strength
σmax
Young's modulus
E
strain at rupture
εrupture
uniform strain
ε at σmax
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
GPa
stdev
GPa
average
%
stdev
%
average
%
stdev
%
-40 329 11 368 4 86 12 2 0 2 0
-20 319 9 365 10 86 14 2 1 2 1
0 314 8 347 7 86 9 2 1 2 1
23 295 7 331 8 85 10 3 1 3 1
40 280 8 317 3 82 4 7 1 4 1
60 238 6 277 2 76 3 12 5 5 1
80 198 4 232 3 64 3 20 3 4 1
135 79 1 93 2 54 4

ZP2, ZP0430, ZnAl4Cu3, alloy 2, Zamak 2, Kirksite
Temperature

°C
Yield strength
σ0,2
Ultimate strength
σmax
Young's modulus
E
strain at rupture
εrupture
uniform strain
ε at σmax
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
GPa
stdev
GPa
average
%
stdev
%
average
%
stdev
%
-40 407 26 443 26 85 12 2 2 2 2
-20 416 13 449 4 79 9 4 1 3 1
0 391 9 431 3 84 7 4 1 4 1
23 360 9 397 4 84 11 6 1 2 1
40 323 7 376 5 81 4 9 1 2 1
60 280 3 338 3 79 4 15 3 2 0
80 236 3 296 4 68 4 18 4 3 0
135 82 1 109 2 58 4

ZP8, ZA8, ZP0810, ZnAl8Cu1, alloy 8
Temperature

°C
Yield strength
σ0,2
Ultimate strength
σmax
Young's modulus
E
strain at rupture
εrupture
uniform strain
ε at σmax
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
MPa
stdev
MPa
average
GPa
stdev
GPa
average
%
stdev
%
average
%
stdev
%
-40 363 10 427 7 90 7 2 0 2 0
-20 346 13 412 11 86 10 2 0 2 0
0 338 10 406 8 83 13 2 1 3 1
20 319 7 387 5 85 3 3 0 3 1
40 291 12 356 7 77 10 3 01 10 3
60 233 7 308 5 76 8 3 0 15 7
80 183 10 260 8 6968 12 3 0 36 6
135 57 3 80 3 51 3

The above tables are illustrated graphically below

Reference 5

Compressive Properties vs Test Temperature

Compressive yield strength of of ZP3, ZP5, ZP2 and ZP8 was determined at six temperatures: -40ºC, -20°C, 0°C 22°C, 75°C, and 135°C. Three specimens were tested at each condition for each alloy. The specimen configuration is a cylinder of 0.24” diameter and 0.48” height. The cylinders were machined from diecast impact test samples. Test speed: 1,1 MPa/sec. Test stopped at 5% compression (6% at -40°C). Strain is based on crosshead displacement.

A summary of these results is given in Table below


Temp.
°C
Yield
Strength
MPa
ZP2 ZP3 ZP5 ZP8
mean st.dev. mean st.dev. mean st.dev. mean st.dev.
-40 0.2% offset 339 18 243 7 284 14 349 18
2% offset 454 4 316 9 377 11 453 11
-20 0.2% offset 310 15 225 1 256 3 337 33
2% offset 424 10 303 5 367 2 446 1
0 0.2% offset 304 7 212 2 256 9 327 24
2% offset 403 4 277 8 353 9 411 1
22 0.2% offset 257 5 274 3 199 2 233 2
2% offset 379 4 373 3 266 5 321 4
75 0.2% offset 212 22 156 13 185 6 180 13
2% offset 288 10 199 9 243 5 258 10
135 0.2% offset 138 8 102 3 109 7 93 9
2% offset 192 7 136 2 153 4 134 8

The above table is illustrated graphically below

The Effect of Test Temperature on the impact strength of Alloys ZP3, ZP5 and ZP2

Impact Energy (J/cm2) for unnotched bars after 8 weeks ageing.

Temperature
°C
ZP3
value
ZP5
value
ZP2
value
-40 6 6 5
-20 11 13 13
-10 25
0 44 130 55
20 116 131 96
40 106 111 104
80 112 103 116

Impact energy vs. temperature- CHARPY test 1/4"" square specimen, 80mm length, section=0,403cm2, aged for 2 months. Impact tests were done with a “Wolpert” impact tester. Average value of 10 test at each condition. Samples air cooled after die-casting

Impact Energy (J/cm2) for notched bars after 8 weeks ageing

Temperature
°C
ZP0400
value
ZP0410
value
ZP0430
value
-40 2 1 2
-20 2 2 2
0 2 2 3
20 5 9 4
40 12 11 8
80 13 14 12

Impact energy vs. temperature- CHARPY test 1/4"" square specimen, 80mm length, section=0,403cm2, aged for 2 months. 2mm, 45° notch included (die casted specimen with notch). Impact tests were done with a “Wolpert” impact tester at room temperature. Average value of 10 test at each condition. Samples air cooled after die-casting

Reference 5

The Effect of Test Temperature on the Impact Strengths of Alloys ZP3, ZP5 and ZP2

6.35mm square bar un-notched (0.40cm2)

6.35mm square bar 2mm 45° V notch

Reference 5

Tensile Properties vs Wall Thickness

sample geometry Lo 70mm
width 12 mm for samples of 1mm thickness
19,6mm for other samples
thickness 0,3 - 3 mm
sample type diecast, air cooled
8 weeks aged at room temperature
test set-up 10 test samples per condition
equipment Zwick/Roell Z050
test speed 10mm/minute
test temperature ambient temperature (20°C)

Reference 5

The stress-strain graphs for zinc alloys ZP3 and ZP5 at different thicknesses are given in the graph below.

The yield strength values in the four tables above are illustrated graphically below

Effect of Ageing at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures

Tensile test conditions

sample geometry Lo 70mm
width 12 mm for samples of 1mm thickness
19,6mm for other samples
thickness 0,3 - 3 mm
sample type diecast, air cooled
aged at room temperature
test set-up 10 test samples per condition
equipment Zwick/Roell Z050
test speed 10mm/minute
test temperature ambient temperature (20°C)

Impact test conditions: Impact Energy (J/cm2) for unnotched samples

sample geometry L 80mm
section 1/4” x 1/4” = 0.4cm2
condition unnotched
sample type diecast, air cooled
aged at room temperature
test set-up 10 test samples per condition
equipment Wolpert impact tester
test temperature ambient temperature (20°C)

Reference 5

Some data from the tables above is displayed graphically below

Effect of Ageing at Elevated Temperature

Properties after 10 days at 95°C, tested at 20°C as compared to 8 weeks room temperature aged samples. Lo 70 mm, Speed 10mm/min, Specimen thickness 1.5mm

Reference 5

The figures in the above table are presented graphically below

Vickers Hardness of Listed Alloys as a Function of Ageing Time at 100oC for Three Thicknesses

Reference 3



Reference 8



Reference 8

Creep Properties

Creep is defined as the time-dependent strain that takes place under a given constant load. Three stages of creep can be distinguished.

1. Primary Creep -the creep strain that occurs at a diminishing rate.
2. Secondary Creep -the creep strain that shows a minimum and almost constant rate.
3. Tertiary Creep -the creep strain that exhibits an accelerating rate, usually leading to rupture.

The elongation (strain) behaviour of zinc alloys is a non-linear function of stress, service temperature, and time under stress. When zinc alloys are subjected to continuous loads, for any considerable period of time, actual tests or empirical mathematical relationships between elongation, stress, time at the given load, and service temperature must be used to predict the strain behaviour of each alloy. The elastic (Young's) modulus of an engineering alloy, defined as stress divided by strain, is often used in design calculations. For zinc alloys, the value of the modulus depends upon stress, strain rate, and temperature, and is determined from short-term tensile tests. The value of the elastic modulus is valid only for the stress, strain rate, and temperature conditions under which it was measured. When short-term stress versus strain curves are available, the elastic modulus can be determined easily and elastic deflections estimated. However, under sustained loads, zinc alloys experience additional irreversible extension and the use of formulae, as set forth in this section is required to estimate the strains that result at given stresses.

The creep behavior of pressure die cast alloys ZP3 and ZP8 with 2 mm wall section can be modeled using the equation below. It is valid over the temperature range of 25°C to 120°C for these alloys. The formula, which relates the maximum design stress σ (MPa) to temperature T (°K), service life t (time, seconds), and strain, was found to be:

Ln σ = C'+Q/RT - Ln t
                     n

Here, n is the stress exponent = 3.5
Q is the activation energy = 106kJ/mol
R is the gas constant = 8.3143 x 10-3 kJ/mol °K
C' = a constant for the given allowable strain (varies with strain for each alloy, as shown below)

Using this equation, it is possible to calculate the permissible combinations of stress, temperature, and creep life for any creep strain within the range of 0.2 to 1%. The equation is valid for stresses up to 50 MPa and temperatures up to 120°C. (The equation has been found to give times to a given elongation that correlate well with all known experimental data).

Creep extension in most alloy systems can be highly inconsistent. Zinc is no exception, and apparently identical samples can vary from the mean creep life (or strain) by a factor of two. Thus whether the creep life to a given strain is determined from actual tests or using the formula described previously, an additional factor of at least two should be applied to either the life or the strain to take into account such individual variations.

Service at elevated temperatures results in aging of all zinc alloys. When the effect of room temperature aging on creep strength of alloy 3 was investigated, it was found that creep strength decreased under both conditions. Testing under high loads showed that the creep strength decreased as much as 16% within two years of aging at room temperature or by heating at 75°C to 95°C for three days. It thus has been suggested that a factor of 0.8 be applied to permissible stress values computed from the equation given above.

The creep rates for alloy ZP5, up to 100°C, can be estimated by using the figures shown in this section for alloy ZP3 and adding 10°C to temperatures given. That is, alloy ZP5 provides approximately equivalent creep behavior at temperatures 10°C higher than those shown for Alloy ZP3.

Limited creep testing undertaken on alloy ZP2 indicates that its performance is equivalent to alloy ZP8. Research is continuing to identify C' vs strain curves for alloys ZP5 and ZP2.

Reference 3 and Reference 2

TOP